HomeReportsToolsPortfolioBioContact
7 Chunks are Better Than 10

If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed, follow me on Twitter or sign up to my email list.

If you want to talk about how I can help with your social & viral marketing campaigns, contact me. Thanks!

A while back I mentioned the cognitive science behind chunking and studies that show that 7 chunks of data is easier for humans to process. Then I asserted that information scenting means that articles with indications they’re chunked would do better on sites like digg. I was speculating that this is why “Top 10″-type posts work so well.
And now, study done by Russ Jones backs that up. He counted up how many “top 12″, “top 11″, “top 10″ etc, lists that made it to the front page of digg, and what number comes out on top with a 59% success rate? 7. (to be fair, his data set seems a little small, especially for non-10 numbers)

If you liked this post, share it:
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Mixx
  • Pownce
  • TwitThis

Contact me to talk about what I can do to help your viral & social marketing campaigns, and don't forget to subscribe to my feed, join my email list or follow me on Twitter to stay up to date.


COMMENTS / ONE COMMENT

Yeah, the dataset is really small, I just used what Google’s cache would show to determine (basically an intitle:”Top 7″ site:digg.com vs: intitle:”Top 7″ “made popular” site:digg.com)

Russ Jones added these pithy words on May 22 07 at 2:30 pm

SPEAK / ADD YOUR COMMENT
Comments are moderated.

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Return to Top