<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Alex Bogusky: What&#8217;s Wrong With ReTweets</title>
	<atom:link href="http://danzarrella.com/alex-bogusky-whats-wrong-with-retweets.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://danzarrella.com/alex-bogusky-whats-wrong-with-retweets.html</link>
	<description>DanZarrella.com, Social &#38; Viral Marketing Scientist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 17:05:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: carla</title>
		<link>http://danzarrella.com/alex-bogusky-whats-wrong-with-retweets.html/comment-page-1#comment-241740</link>
		<dc:creator>carla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 22:51:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danzarrella.com/?p=1262#comment-241740</guid>
		<description>If someone ReTweets a blog post of mine and forgets to put &quot;RT&quot; before I don’t see that as a huge deal.  My blog posts should have my &quot;signature&quot; anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If someone ReTweets a blog post of mine and forgets to put &#8220;RT&#8221; before I don’t see that as a huge deal.  My blog posts should have my &#8220;signature&#8221; anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve Poppe</title>
		<link>http://danzarrella.com/alex-bogusky-whats-wrong-with-retweets.html/comment-page-1#comment-241682</link>
		<dc:creator>steve Poppe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 14:16:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danzarrella.com/?p=1262#comment-241682</guid>
		<description>If the tweeted marketing idea is clean enough and truthful, it will be hard to misinterpret or retweet inaccurately. If someone is just tossing mud, that&#039;s okay, it will be seen as such. This medium is here to stay and extremely powerful.  We, as marketers, just have to learn how not to &quot;f&quot; it up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the tweeted marketing idea is clean enough and truthful, it will be hard to misinterpret or retweet inaccurately. If someone is just tossing mud, that&#8217;s okay, it will be seen as such. This medium is here to stay and extremely powerful.  We, as marketers, just have to learn how not to &#8220;f&#8221; it up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Korhan</title>
		<link>http://danzarrella.com/alex-bogusky-whats-wrong-with-retweets.html/comment-page-1#comment-240612</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Korhan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:04:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danzarrella.com/?p=1262#comment-240612</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think we need to overthink ReTweeting.  Sure, the message may change as it moves around, but then doesn&#039;t it already?  That&#039;s human behavior at work. My feeling is you can always set the record straight if necessary, and if you are transparent in your marketing behavior, that should be easy accomplished.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think we need to overthink ReTweeting.  Sure, the message may change as it moves around, but then doesn&#8217;t it already?  That&#8217;s human behavior at work. My feeling is you can always set the record straight if necessary, and if you are transparent in your marketing behavior, that should be easy accomplished.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
