Comments on: Viral Tweet Survey Preview: Blogging About Tweets

By: Mike McDermott

Mike McDermott — Wed, 27 May 2009 23:45:40 +0000

Dan, I read this title and then the body of this article and still am left scratching my head…

Is it not a human natural propensity to first develop a complete thought from front to back and then regurgitate that idea in brevity and with variation?

These graphs go counter the way I do business.. I write an insightful (sometimes spelled inciteful) blog posting and then tweet about it in order to gain counterpoint and initiate further dialogue both on Twitter and within the blog comments section.

Working from Twitter back to Blog post also eliminates any level of subject matter credibility. Just ask all those idiot celebrities about how they feel about people “impersonating” them on Twitter. I bet folks don’t try to impersonate them on a blog.
Working from blog out to microblog and bookmark sites are the only way to have a “point of reference”.

Move along, these are not the droids you are looking for….

By: Mike

Mike — Sat, 23 May 2009 20:44:28 +0000

Hi, nice posts there thank’s for the interesting information

By: SEODr

SEODr — Fri, 22 May 2009 15:17:36 +0000

Interesting post. It just shows the huge Twitter explosion over the past year or so. The real time aspect of Twitter just makes it the place to go for new, fresh ideas.

By: Edison Samuel

Edison Samuel — Tue, 19 May 2009 10:18:24 +0000

Yeah you have mentioned excellent points and very helpful graph.

By: Davin - The Viral Sanctuary

Davin - The Viral Sanctuary — Tue, 19 May 2009 02:10:36 +0000

I’m relatively new to watching your blog Dan. I must say each time I visit I completely enjoy how you analyze and gage results so much. You definitely do take a very scientific approach!

Cheers
Davin

By: elle

elle — Mon, 18 May 2009 17:42:52 +0000

I think people pull ideas from Twitter to blog about. Usually the ones that are most exciting to them stem from entertainment- the whole ashton/cnn thing is just one prime example. Sometimes people grab onto some controversy or new concept as well. I get a lot of my ideas from the conversations that I start on Twitter and then expand it into a blog post. I think people just like fresh/new/hot topics, and social media delivers that on a silver platter for people to eat up.

By: Mat

Mat — Mon, 18 May 2009 08:08:53 +0000

People blog about whats interesting to them, and i guess the entertainment industry fills that requirement for a lot of people.

By: Deb B.

Deb B. — Sun, 17 May 2009 21:27:59 +0000

Hi Dan, to me your statistics make perfect sense. If you have been blogging for quite some time and you want to remain current, one of the easiest ways, from my perspective, to remain part of the conversation is to blog about celebs and Hollywood. These topics still sell, and I’m guessing always will:).

By: Dan Zarrella

Dan Zarrella — Fri, 15 May 2009 18:38:51 +0000

@david I do try to do direct observation where possible since I agree it often produces larger/better result sets, like in the case of retweet data. But there is also something to be said about asking about motivational data (why someone did something) and asking about things that are nearly impossible to observe (like blogging about tweets).

By: David

David — Fri, 15 May 2009 18:01:49 +0000

Dan,
People probably blog about entertainment because they spend $$$ on it and are interested in it. Entertainment blogging may take less research and certainly has a gossip aspect to it. We know people like to gossip

By: David Fisher

David Fisher — Fri, 15 May 2009 17:53:47 +0000

How do you feel about surveying vs direct observation/scraping for results?

It seems that surveys generally produce too few results and are too self selecting. What have you experiences been with this?