<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cumulative Percentage Curves of Keyword Niches</title>
	<atom:link href="http://danzarrella.com/cumulative-percentage-curves-of-keyword-niches.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://danzarrella.com/cumulative-percentage-curves-of-keyword-niches.html</link>
	<description>DanZarrella.com, Social &#38; Viral Marketing Scientist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 18:12:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: karel</title>
		<link>http://danzarrella.com/cumulative-percentage-curves-of-keyword-niches.html/comment-page-1#comment-265335</link>
		<dc:creator>karel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 01:19:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danzarrella.com/cumulative-percentage-curves-of-keyword-niches.html#comment-265335</guid>
		<description>nice but wouldnt it be more clear to plot those graphs on a log scale?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice but wouldnt it be more clear to plot those graphs on a log scale?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: karel</title>
		<link>http://danzarrella.com/cumulative-percentage-curves-of-keyword-niches.html/comment-page-1#comment-264760</link>
		<dc:creator>karel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 18:19:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danzarrella.com/cumulative-percentage-curves-of-keyword-niches.html#comment-264760</guid>
		<description>nice but wouldnt it be more clear to plot those graphs on a log scale?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice but wouldnt it be more clear to plot those graphs on a log scale?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Short Head is not because of Economics &#187; Dan Zarrella</title>
		<link>http://danzarrella.com/cumulative-percentage-curves-of-keyword-niches.html/comment-page-1#comment-115</link>
		<dc:creator>The Short Head is not because of Economics &#187; Dan Zarrella</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2006 23:22:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danzarrella.com/cumulative-percentage-curves-of-keyword-niches.html#comment-115</guid>
		<description>[...] In a previous post I talked about the short head and long tail of keyword traffic. The 80/20 rule doesn&#8217;t quite apply but some general 20-40/80 rule does. Despite the fact that multiple and more targetted keyword phrases don&#8217;t cost anything for the searcher, keyword traffic still roughly follows a pareto curve. In his Chris Anderson asserts the 80/20 rule is enforced by powers of economics. In the music industry the risks and costs to music companies defines what becomes a &#8220;hit&#8221;. In keywords the only powers driving towards a pareto distrobution are similarities in the way people express themselves. Its only a small slice of expression, a few words used to describe something we want, but the head and tail distribution suggests we all comunicate in strikingly similar ways. Or at least a lot of us do. Building on my new PHP POS Tagger and my PHP ngram tokenizer I plan to study wikipedia as a course to derive some data about distribution curves of the most popular ngrams and how they can relate to keyword selection.  These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In a previous post I talked about the short head and long tail of keyword traffic. The 80/20 rule doesn&#8217;t quite apply but some general 20-40/80 rule does. Despite the fact that multiple and more targetted keyword phrases don&#8217;t cost anything for the searcher, keyword traffic still roughly follows a pareto curve. In his Chris Anderson asserts the 80/20 rule is enforced by powers of economics. In the music industry the risks and costs to music companies defines what becomes a &#8220;hit&#8221;. In keywords the only powers driving towards a pareto distrobution are similarities in the way people express themselves. Its only a small slice of expression, a few words used to describe something we want, but the head and tail distribution suggests we all comunicate in strikingly similar ways. Or at least a lot of us do. Building on my new PHP POS Tagger and my PHP ngram tokenizer I plan to study wikipedia as a course to derive some data about distribution curves of the most popular ngrams and how they can relate to keyword selection.  These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The New England Geek &#187; Blog Archive &#187; How Many of You Find what You Want on the Search Engines</title>
		<link>http://danzarrella.com/cumulative-percentage-curves-of-keyword-niches.html/comment-page-1#comment-107</link>
		<dc:creator>The New England Geek &#187; Blog Archive &#187; How Many of You Find what You Want on the Search Engines</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2006 15:20:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danzarrella.com/cumulative-percentage-curves-of-keyword-niches.html#comment-107</guid>
		<description>[...] Dan Zarrella ? Blog Archive ? Cumulative Percentage Curves of Keyword Niches [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Dan Zarrella ? Blog Archive ? Cumulative Percentage Curves of Keyword Niches [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

