<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Initial Thoughts on Ad Intelligence</title>
	<link>http://danzarrella.com/initial-thoughts-on-ad-intelligence.html</link>
	<description>DanZarrella.com, yes there are two Rs.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 00:30:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Pablo Palatnik</title>
		<link>http://danzarrella.com/initial-thoughts-on-ad-intelligence.html#comment-46012</link>
		<author>Pablo Palatnik</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 07:03:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://danzarrella.com/initial-thoughts-on-ad-intelligence.html#comment-46012</guid>
		<description>I've been looking for a GOOD keyword tool for a while now. I don't think there are any GOOD keyword tools out there to be honest.

I'll deff give this a shot to see how well it functions but it's free...thats a great advantage. KeywordDiscovery, has done the job and even though these "do the job", I've yet to be really satisfied with a keyword tool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been looking for a GOOD keyword tool for a while now. I don&#8217;t think there are any GOOD keyword tools out there to be honest.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll deff give this a shot to see how well it functions but it&#8217;s free&#8230;thats a great advantage. KeywordDiscovery, has done the job and even though these &#8220;do the job&#8221;, I&#8217;ve yet to be really satisfied with a keyword tool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Zarrella</title>
		<link>http://danzarrella.com/initial-thoughts-on-ad-intelligence.html#comment-45979</link>
		<author>Dan Zarrella</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 01:37:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://danzarrella.com/initial-thoughts-on-ad-intelligence.html#comment-45979</guid>
		<description>@streko I dunno, i kinda like the fact that ms seems genuinely interested in giving search marketers new and more generally applicable tools. Of course they don't have the traffic yet, but this keyword tool could still be more useful than wordtracker if they cleaned the data, i have to imagine they have more data than WT</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@streko I dunno, i kinda like the fact that ms seems genuinely interested in giving search marketers new and more generally applicable tools. Of course they don&#8217;t have the traffic yet, but this keyword tool could still be more useful than wordtracker if they cleaned the data, i have to imagine they have more data than WT</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Streko</title>
		<link>http://danzarrella.com/initial-thoughts-on-ad-intelligence.html#comment-45960</link>
		<author>Michael Streko</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 21:36:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://danzarrella.com/initial-thoughts-on-ad-intelligence.html#comment-45960</guid>
		<description>Its microsoft + the web, what were you expecting?  In my opinion they should hammer out their report generation time and usability before attempting to roll out any new SEM related products...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its microsoft + the web, what were you expecting?  In my opinion they should hammer out their report generation time and usability before attempting to roll out any new SEM related products&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.421 seconds -->
