<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What is Content Development to an SEO?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://danzarrella.com/what-is-content-development-to-an-seo.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://danzarrella.com/what-is-content-development-to-an-seo.html</link>
	<description>DanZarrella.com, Social &#38; Viral Marketing Scientist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 13:36:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabriella</title>
		<link>http://danzarrella.com/what-is-content-development-to-an-seo.html/comment-page-1#comment-233811</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabriella</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 19:39:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danzarrella.com/what-is-content-development-to-an-seo.html#comment-233811</guid>
		<description>Hey Dan - I have been reading your posts, and for the most part I agree.  This one, however, I had to read a few times.  The thing I don&#039;t get is how you can advise people to &quot;re-write&quot; content that is already out there.  I am sure people with enough education can paraphrase any article and make it pass through copyscape.  However, I&#039;m an oldtimer.  I&#039;ve been on the Internet since 1992, and quite honestly am tired of seeing so many rewritten articls.  We have enough regurgitated information out there.  I would think, with as many followers and readers you have, that you would advise them to write something originial and/or controversial - not to rewrite something that&#039;s already out there.  The beauty of this, is that it may not get high traffic to start with, but the &quot;information&quot; will be more than content.  It will be original, thought-out content.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Dan &#8211; I have been reading your posts, and for the most part I agree.  This one, however, I had to read a few times.  The thing I don&#8217;t get is how you can advise people to &#8220;re-write&#8221; content that is already out there.  I am sure people with enough education can paraphrase any article and make it pass through copyscape.  However, I&#8217;m an oldtimer.  I&#8217;ve been on the Internet since 1992, and quite honestly am tired of seeing so many rewritten articls.  We have enough regurgitated information out there.  I would think, with as many followers and readers you have, that you would advise them to write something originial and/or controversial &#8211; not to rewrite something that&#8217;s already out there.  The beauty of this, is that it may not get high traffic to start with, but the &#8220;information&#8221; will be more than content.  It will be original, thought-out content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

