<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Zarrella&#8217;s Hierarchy of Contagiousness</title>
	<atom:link href="http://danzarrella.com/zarrellas-hierarchy-of-contagiousness.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://danzarrella.com/zarrellas-hierarchy-of-contagiousness.html</link>
	<description>DanZarrella.com, Social &#38; Viral Marketing Scientist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 13:36:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Pall Masters Experiment &#124; The Idea Farm</title>
		<link>http://danzarrella.com/zarrellas-hierarchy-of-contagiousness.html/comment-page-1#comment-287083</link>
		<dc:creator>The Pall Masters Experiment &#124; The Idea Farm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 00:40:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danzarrella.com/?p=2281#comment-287083</guid>
		<description>[...] just finished reading the Hierarchy of Contagiousness by Dan Zarella and I was completely inspired to take action. I wiped out my blog and I am starting [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] just finished reading the Hierarchy of Contagiousness by Dan Zarella and I was completely inspired to take action. I wiped out my blog and I am starting [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Top Ten Tips for Creating Contagious ContentListenIn Pictures &#124; ListenIn Pictures</title>
		<link>http://danzarrella.com/zarrellas-hierarchy-of-contagiousness.html/comment-page-1#comment-286807</link>
		<dc:creator>Top Ten Tips for Creating Contagious ContentListenIn Pictures &#124; ListenIn Pictures</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 21:01:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danzarrella.com/?p=2281#comment-286807</guid>
		<description>[...] just finished reading Zarella&#8217;s Hierarchy of Contagiousness. It&#8217;s mostly about text based content, but I&#8217;ve taken his lessons and translated them [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] just finished reading Zarella&#8217;s Hierarchy of Contagiousness. It&#8217;s mostly about text based content, but I&#8217;ve taken his lessons and translated them [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why You Should Ask For a +K on Twitter - Strawberryj.am Blog</title>
		<link>http://danzarrella.com/zarrellas-hierarchy-of-contagiousness.html/comment-page-1#comment-285821</link>
		<dc:creator>Why You Should Ask For a +K on Twitter - Strawberryj.am Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 17:31:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danzarrella.com/?p=2281#comment-285821</guid>
		<description>[...] to the book, &#8220;Zarrella&#8217;s Hierarchy of Contagiousness&#8221; which investigates social media from a purely statistical standpoint, has some interesting [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to the book, &#8220;Zarrella&#8217;s Hierarchy of Contagiousness&#8221; which investigates social media from a purely statistical standpoint, has some interesting [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 5 Rules (from High School) for Social Media &#124;</title>
		<link>http://danzarrella.com/zarrellas-hierarchy-of-contagiousness.html/comment-page-1#comment-285696</link>
		<dc:creator>5 Rules (from High School) for Social Media &#124;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2011 15:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danzarrella.com/?p=2281#comment-285696</guid>
		<description>[...] #1 Don’t worry so much about popularity. Klout scores being all the rage, it’s hard not to want to have the most friends.  And as a business, you do want to be popular.  While it’s not a popularity race,  Dan Zarrella @Hubspot points out that “In the vast majority of real cases, someone with 10,000 followers has more reach and influence than someone with 100.”   The good news is that social media is not all about guesswork.  There are some practical steps you can take to increase traffic to your blog and your website.  Try Zarella’s Hierarchy of Contagiousness: Exposure, Awareness, Motivation.  More on this here: http://bit.ly/p2OKZL [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] #1 Don’t worry so much about popularity. Klout scores being all the rage, it’s hard not to want to have the most friends.  And as a business, you do want to be popular.  While it’s not a popularity race,  Dan Zarrella @Hubspot points out that “In the vast majority of real cases, someone with 10,000 followers has more reach and influence than someone with 100.”   The good news is that social media is not all about guesswork.  There are some practical steps you can take to increase traffic to your blog and your website.  Try Zarella’s Hierarchy of Contagiousness: Exposure, Awareness, Motivation.  More on this here: <a href="http://bit.ly/p2OKZL" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/p2OKZL</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Science Of Social Media Marketing And Campaign Longevity For Emerging Brands - SEO Blog: Search Engine Optimization and Search Marketing :: Get Page One</title>
		<link>http://danzarrella.com/zarrellas-hierarchy-of-contagiousness.html/comment-page-1#comment-285688</link>
		<dc:creator>The Science Of Social Media Marketing And Campaign Longevity For Emerging Brands - SEO Blog: Search Engine Optimization and Search Marketing :: Get Page One</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 22:53:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danzarrella.com/?p=2281#comment-285688</guid>
		<description>[...] messages and the life and death of ReTweeted tweets. At Get Page One, we argue that in addition to Zarrella&#8217;s hierarchical strategy, you must also explicitly include influential people that will further champion your social media [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] messages and the life and death of ReTweeted tweets. At Get Page One, we argue that in addition to Zarrella&#8217;s hierarchical strategy, you must also explicitly include influential people that will further champion your social media [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Three Schools Of Twitter Marketing &#124; Practice Kaizen</title>
		<link>http://danzarrella.com/zarrellas-hierarchy-of-contagiousness.html/comment-page-1#comment-283064</link>
		<dc:creator>The Three Schools Of Twitter Marketing &#124; Practice Kaizen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2010 17:57:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danzarrella.com/?p=2281#comment-283064</guid>
		<description>[...] to the Dan Zarrella’s hierarchy of contagiousness, you need these three important things to succeed with your [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to the Dan Zarrella’s hierarchy of contagiousness, you need these three important things to succeed with your [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Size Matters: How a Large Online Network Can Transform You, Your Marketing, and Your Business &#124; The SocialGrow Blog</title>
		<link>http://danzarrella.com/zarrellas-hierarchy-of-contagiousness.html/comment-page-1#comment-266522</link>
		<dc:creator>Size Matters: How a Large Online Network Can Transform You, Your Marketing, and Your Business &#124; The SocialGrow Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 18:17:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danzarrella.com/?p=2281#comment-266522</guid>
		<description>[...] Additional Reading “It all starts with having the largest possible audience.” -Dan Zarrella, Hierarchy of Contagiousness “Marketers must connect on social networks with people they don’t know, namely their [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Additional Reading “It all starts with having the largest possible audience.” -Dan Zarrella, Hierarchy of Contagiousness “Marketers must connect on social networks with people they don’t know, namely their [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Haydon</title>
		<link>http://danzarrella.com/zarrellas-hierarchy-of-contagiousness.html/comment-page-1#comment-266496</link>
		<dc:creator>John Haydon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 01:08:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danzarrella.com/?p=2281#comment-266496</guid>
		<description>The point of this post is to outline a framework for how content spreads online. Dan assumes that we can plug in our own numbers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The point of this post is to outline a framework for how content spreads online. Dan assumes that we can plug in our own numbers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Haydon</title>
		<link>http://danzarrella.com/zarrellas-hierarchy-of-contagiousness.html/comment-page-1#comment-266495</link>
		<dc:creator>John Haydon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 01:05:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danzarrella.com/?p=2281#comment-266495</guid>
		<description>Dan - I&#039;m really curious about this model you&#039;ve created (it&#039;s a very novel idea... ;-) ), and I especially like your point of changing numbers in our favor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan &#8211; I&#39;m really curious about this model you&#39;ve created (it&#39;s a very novel idea&#8230; <img src='http://danzarrella.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />  ), and I especially like your point of changing numbers in our favor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vincent</title>
		<link>http://danzarrella.com/zarrellas-hierarchy-of-contagiousness.html/comment-page-1#comment-266181</link>
		<dc:creator>Vincent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 17:32:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danzarrella.com/?p=2281#comment-266181</guid>
		<description>Hi Dan,&lt;br&gt;I&#039;m with some of Richard&#039;s comments on this one. Maybe it&#039;s the choice of word; contagiousness&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;18 out of 900 doesn&#039;t sound very contagious, certainly not in the &#039;viral&#039; world?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dan,<br />I&#39;m with some of Richard&#39;s comments on this one. Maybe it&#39;s the choice of word; contagiousness</p>
<p>18 out of 900 doesn&#39;t sound very contagious, certainly not in the &#39;viral&#39; world?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Kownacki - Sorry Guys: When It Comes to Your Audience, Size DOES Matter</title>
		<link>http://danzarrella.com/zarrellas-hierarchy-of-contagiousness.html/comment-page-1#comment-266105</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Kownacki - Sorry Guys: When It Comes to Your Audience, Size DOES Matter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 05:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danzarrella.com/?p=2281#comment-266105</guid>
		<description>[...] Zarrella created a graph he calls Zarrella&#8217;s Hierarchy of Contagiousness, which says that in order for a message to be successful, it must [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Zarrella created a graph he calls Zarrella&#8217;s Hierarchy of Contagiousness, which says that in order for a message to be successful, it must [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Creative Concepts - Is Your Company Afraid to Matter?</title>
		<link>http://danzarrella.com/zarrellas-hierarchy-of-contagiousness.html/comment-page-1#comment-266071</link>
		<dc:creator>Creative Concepts - Is Your Company Afraid to Matter?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 12:02:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danzarrella.com/?p=2281#comment-266071</guid>
		<description>[...] the numbers on social media than anyone else we know. He recently proposed something he calls Zarrella&#8217;s Hierarchy of Contagiousness, which breaks down [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the numbers on social media than anyone else we know. He recently proposed something he calls Zarrella&#8217;s Hierarchy of Contagiousness, which breaks down [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tim diaz</title>
		<link>http://danzarrella.com/zarrellas-hierarchy-of-contagiousness.html/comment-page-1#comment-266082</link>
		<dc:creator>tim diaz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 01:11:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danzarrella.com/?p=2281#comment-266082</guid>
		<description>Very creative Dan! Just a fun fact, if you ever need a yacht or boat shipped anywhere, Yacht Exports is your best bet. They have done a great job with me!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very creative Dan! Just a fun fact, if you ever need a yacht or boat shipped anywhere, Yacht Exports is your best bet. They have done a great job with me!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Electronic Cigarette Girl</title>
		<link>http://danzarrella.com/zarrellas-hierarchy-of-contagiousness.html/comment-page-1#comment-266011</link>
		<dc:creator>Electronic Cigarette Girl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 20:51:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danzarrella.com/?p=2281#comment-266011</guid>
		<description>Ill be developing my fb and myspace profiles based on this and will know if it works or not haha jk. Im sure its great advice, I just have to apply it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;-Bella :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ill be developing my fb and myspace profiles based on this and will know if it works or not haha jk. Im sure its great advice, I just have to apply it.</p>
<p>-Bella <img src='http://danzarrella.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bernd Traumpartner</title>
		<link>http://danzarrella.com/zarrellas-hierarchy-of-contagiousness.html/comment-page-1#comment-283007</link>
		<dc:creator>Bernd Traumpartner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 14:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danzarrella.com/?p=2281#comment-283007</guid>
		<description>I Think most people are tweeting because they want to get regonized.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I Think most people are tweeting because they want to get regonized.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KINGRPG</title>
		<link>http://danzarrella.com/zarrellas-hierarchy-of-contagiousness.html/comment-page-1#comment-265981</link>
		<dc:creator>KINGRPG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 14:06:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danzarrella.com/?p=2281#comment-265981</guid>
		<description>I like that you think. Thank you for share very much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like that you think. Thank you for share very much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Clendenin</title>
		<link>http://danzarrella.com/zarrellas-hierarchy-of-contagiousness.html/comment-page-1#comment-265948</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Clendenin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 07:48:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danzarrella.com/?p=2281#comment-265948</guid>
		<description>I would assume the graph above can be applied again with each of the 18 people who retweet your content to their followers (exposure).  While the 18 are indeed increasing your exposure, the contagiousness is always diminishing.  But if somebody with tons of followers and clout retweets you then your exposure goes up again and instead of 18 you have like 200 people retweeting and the virus starts spreading...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;m pulling this out of my arse, but maybe you can think of it like riding a bicycle.  As you peddle, you move forward.  Without more peddling you coast to a stop.  Your forward movement represents your contagiousness.  It&#039;s always fighting gravity and friction to stop.  If your exposure is low, it&#039;s like your not peddling.  If your awareness or motivation are low then it&#039;s like you&#039;re going uphill.  If your exposure is good then you&#039;re peddling hard and if you&#039;re awareness and motivation are great you&#039;re also on a downhill picking up speed!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Not sure if that analogy works or is even accurate, but it was helpful to me.  This stuff is fascinating to learn about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would assume the graph above can be applied again with each of the 18 people who retweet your content to their followers (exposure).  While the 18 are indeed increasing your exposure, the contagiousness is always diminishing.  But if somebody with tons of followers and clout retweets you then your exposure goes up again and instead of 18 you have like 200 people retweeting and the virus starts spreading&#8230;</p>
<p>I&#39;m pulling this out of my arse, but maybe you can think of it like riding a bicycle.  As you peddle, you move forward.  Without more peddling you coast to a stop.  Your forward movement represents your contagiousness.  It&#39;s always fighting gravity and friction to stop.  If your exposure is low, it&#39;s like your not peddling.  If your awareness or motivation are low then it&#39;s like you&#39;re going uphill.  If your exposure is good then you&#39;re peddling hard and if you&#39;re awareness and motivation are great you&#39;re also on a downhill picking up speed!</p>
<p>Not sure if that analogy works or is even accurate, but it was helpful to me.  This stuff is fascinating to learn about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ckwrites2</title>
		<link>http://danzarrella.com/zarrellas-hierarchy-of-contagiousness.html/comment-page-1#comment-265945</link>
		<dc:creator>ckwrites2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 00:15:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danzarrella.com/?p=2281#comment-265945</guid>
		<description>marvelous adaptation of the classic sales funnel, or as I like to call it the social media marketing funnel - interesting to see that self selection and relevance remain the driving forces. wondering Dan if this also relates to the very brief half life of a tweet and even more so a retweet?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>marvelous adaptation of the classic sales funnel, or as I like to call it the social media marketing funnel &#8211; interesting to see that self selection and relevance remain the driving forces. wondering Dan if this also relates to the very brief half life of a tweet and even more so a retweet?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Zarrella</title>
		<link>http://danzarrella.com/zarrellas-hierarchy-of-contagiousness.html/comment-page-1#comment-265943</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Zarrella</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 21:46:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danzarrella.com/?p=2281#comment-265943</guid>
		<description>If 900 people see your content, maybe 18 will share it with others.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If 900 people see your content, maybe 18 will share it with others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richardlebovitz</title>
		<link>http://danzarrella.com/zarrellas-hierarchy-of-contagiousness.html/comment-page-1#comment-265942</link>
		<dc:creator>richardlebovitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 21:20:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danzarrella.com/?p=2281#comment-265942</guid>
		<description>The graphic shows the conversion rate for a piece of content delivered via Twitter or email, and that this rate diminishes more or less based on the three criteria you describe. That much I understand. What I&#039;m saying is that most people view social media as a way to expand reach, whereas your model shows a contraction. While what those initial 900 and the next 180 are a concern, I&#039;m curious about those remaining 18 and where they fit into the equation, in other words, how do we leverage that initial 900 into, say, 1,800. I believe you&#039;ve already answered that question as it relates to &quot;content,&quot; &quot;relevancy&quot; and &quot;call to action.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The graphic shows the conversion rate for a piece of content delivered via Twitter or email, and that this rate diminishes more or less based on the three criteria you describe. That much I understand. What I&#39;m saying is that most people view social media as a way to expand reach, whereas your model shows a contraction. While what those initial 900 and the next 180 are a concern, I&#39;m curious about those remaining 18 and where they fit into the equation, in other words, how do we leverage that initial 900 into, say, 1,800. I believe you&#39;ve already answered that question as it relates to &#8220;content,&#8221; &#8220;relevancy&#8221; and &#8220;call to action.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

