How to Use “Us vs Them” Stories to create Social Media Evangelists

Feb 23rd 2010 View Comments




Us vs them is one of the oldest, and most powerful marketing ideas. Apple is a quintessential example: from their beginnings they’ve portrayed themselves as the small guy against the big powerful bully. In 1983 it was IBM and more recently its been Microsoft. The company turns customers into evangelists who are more than happy to spread the word about the good fight, but how exactly does it work?

In a 1983 article titled “On Viral Sentences and Self-Replicating Structures” the author, Douglas R. Hofstadter recounts a letter he was sent in response to a previous peice. This letter describes self replicating (viral) sentences, beginning with the rudimentary:

It is your duty to convince others that this is true.

The letter writer notes the obvious: unless the listener believes the statement above, it won’t spread. (Tweet this and see what happens.) He then moves on to a more sophisticated structure where the above sentance occurs at the end of a set of beliefs:

If the listener accepts statements S1 through S99 they will act on S100.This is how many religions work, the belief system is the bait and attached to it is an evangelism hook.

The letter then explores a more subtle variation based on a simple structure:

The villain is wronging the victim.

If the listener believes this statement, and believes that the victim deserves to be saved and if the villain is bigger or more powerful than them they will realize that the only way to effectively challenge the villain is to recruit more people to help. The evangelism hook is implicit, subtle and powerful.

When I looked at urban legends I found a similar phenomenon that occurs with striking regularity online called the Goliath effect. Simply put, people love to communicate about abuses of power against the underdog. Microsoft and the RIAA are favorite Goliaths of the web.

If we want to design a viral idea based on this structure, we have 3 blanks to fill: “villain,” “victim,” and “wronging.” For example let’s look at the title of one of my most popular blog posts ever:

Twitter plans to Mangle ReTweets.”

The easiest way to make someone believe that he victim is worth saving is to make them identify with the victim, in this case anyone who ReTweets. ReTweeters were the target of this sentence, and given their contagious behavior, they make a wonderful audience.

The villain of this sentence is, of course, Twitter. They may not be a huge company, but they’re larger and more powerful in this area than any individual user. The only way someone could hope to #saveretweets would be to recruit all of their followers in the fight.

In the post I spent considerable time asserting and proving the “wronging” part. I explained why the proposed changes were going bad and needed to be stopped or at least challenged, this is the “bait” part in the figure above.

If you liked this post, don't forget to subscribe to my RSS feed or my email newsletter so you never miss the science.

Take this quick survey and tell me what social media data you'd like to see me analyze.

  • sebasluke

    Wooooow it really is an impressive point of view. Don't remember who said “don't create a business, create a cause” I've been thinking about it and realised that perhaps the only way to create a cause is to identify an enemy, a much bigger stronger enemy, so you can fight like Poet Warrior (William Wallace style) and feel way inspired.

    You made it clear for me with this post that it may be in the right track, and perhaps it's a strategy worth applying. Thanks for that!

  • http://twitter.com/RichEverts Richard Everts

    Yeh, I think you're pretty spot on.

    It's a common sales term as well called the Yes-Set close. It doesn't necessarily take 99 iterations before acceptance, but merely a yes-yes-close format. i.e.:
    Do you like coming to shop here?
    Is it easy to find us?
    Did this product catch your eye?
    Are you ready to buy it now?
    Will you want to take delivery next week?
    Sometimes you'll have to repeat the yes-set close a couple of times but essentially it's a similar system in that steps 1-3 lead to action in step 4. It's a sales job, one way or the other.

    Throwing in the victim card is easy, especially here in the States as we're conditioned to “root” for the underdog constantly. People should remember though that Americans love to destroy their heroes as well, as there was a time when people were rooting for Microsoft, just as they rooted for Google and are now starting to turn on them.

    Love the post. Looking forward to more.

  • katherinemoody

    I can't say I understand everything you say but the parts I get? I like them. Your writing about Social Media is some of the smartest and most useful I've found. Thank you for sharing your unique perspective. That in itself has been a wonderful example for me. Now I'm going off to talk about the villains, victims and wronging in my articles for jobseekers.

  • katherinemoody

    Have to admit I don't understand everything you say, but what I do get? I like! I identified what I consider the villains, victims and wronging in job search advice, but was not sure how to communicate that. Thank you for a great post.

  • sandyallnock

    Interesting idea….my brain is trying to figure out how to turn my org's purpose into something that would engender this kind of evangelism. (We send out blank handmade cards to deployed troops so they can write home.) “War is keeping families apart”….”Sons can't send love to Mom for Mother's Day” ?? Hmm. Needs more brain power. Maybe I need more java! lol.

  • http://twitter.com/LinkedMedia Linked Media Group

    You did a good job of synthesizing complex marketing methodologies to hero/villain “stories” – these methods have been used not only for marketing purposes but to rally the troops since the time Rome invaded the British Isles. :-) Twitter was on the other side of the story in their early days but has now “met the enemy and he is us” (Pogo), building on your metaphorical analysis.

  • Pingback: links for 2010-02-24 « Francis Anderson

  • http://www.rohanrrao.wordpress.com/ Rohan R. Rao

    Mangle retweets post isn’t linked properly. Please check the link.
    Regards,

  • http://www.brandlessons.com @brandlessons

    @sebasluke You couldn't have it said it any better.

  • womenable

    I can't help but think that this zero-sum-game strategy emanates from an “art of war” perspective than from an art of business viewpoint. From the perspective of many women business owners (and men as well), one can do well by doing good, and one does not have to climb to victory over the bodies of one's competitors.

  • http://twitter.com/fm1971 Fernando Martins

    Fantastic article! You're spot on, Dan!

  • Pingback: This week’s most clicked | SmartBlog On Social Media

  • Pingback: Favorite Articles and Popular Tweets of the Week – 2/26/10

  • http://twitter.com/MommasCrap Momma

    There is a book called “Switch, How to change things when change is hard.” You should really read this first chapter. The premise is much like yours.

    http://heathbrothers.com/switch/chapterone.php

  • http://taylormarek.com/ taylormarek

    Awesome post Dan. I can always count on you to pull out the “science behind social media” and tell it like it is. Keep it up! :D